roca1018 163 posts msg #149901 - Ignore roca1018 | 
12/17/2019 7:19:35 AM
  Ed, 
 
 Is there a way to modify this filter so that people with a basic subscription can run it? 
 
 Thanks
 
 Rich
 
  | 
nibor100 1,099 posts msg #149903 - Ignore nibor100 | 
12/17/2019 11:31:22 AM
  @roca1018,
 
 I'm not certain which filter you are referring to, can you please clarify?
 
 Thanks,
 Ed S.
 
  | 
roca1018 163 posts msg #149927 - Ignore roca1018 | 
12/19/2019 6:58:59 AM
  Thanks Ed. You posted the filter on this thread on 12/4/19. It requires a higher subscription.
 
 Rich
 
  | 
nibor100 1,099 posts msg #149931 - Ignore nibor100 | 
12/19/2019 1:08:49 PM
  @roca1018,
 
 Try the version below with a modification that Cheese implemented:
 
 Thanks,
 Ed S.
 
  	    
 
  | 
roca1018 163 posts msg #149983 - Ignore roca1018 | 
12/23/2019 5:41:11 AM
  Ed,
 
 There are 306 stocks listed for the close on 12/20/19. Is it best to choose stocks based on their historical
 winning % ?
 
 Thanks
 
 Rich
 
  | 
nibor100 1,099 posts msg #150015 - Ignore nibor100 | 
12/25/2019 10:35:24 AM
  @Rich,
 
 1.  I have not tested whether or not it is best to choose stocks based on their historical winning % for this filter's results so I can't really answer your question.
 
 2.  Please remember that this filter is the first in a series of Weinstein exploratory filters I'm planning on trying out, when I get around to it.  This filter is only testing the 30 week/150 day moving avg crossover and none of the other Weinstein key criteria.
 
 3.  Also, the Xarlor filter I started with has some criteria which may or may not be applicable to pure Weinstein theory.such as the section on general assumptions about price and volume.
 
 Thanks,
 Ed S.
 
  
 
  | 
sandjco 648 posts msg #150016 - Ignore sandjco | 
12/25/2019 10:48:06 AM
  Not sure if this applies..
 
 Adding this line  	    
 
 my eye test on sorting wr%...100% wr wasn't conclusive i.e. a 100% wr ended having higher gains vs lower wr.
 
  | 
roca1018 163 posts msg #150022 - Ignore roca1018 | 
12/26/2019 6:41:44 AM
  Thanks Ed
 
  |